Problem Pages.co.uk Forums

by **Gem** » Tue Oct 14, 2003 4:06 pm

Hi everyone,
I have suddenly managed to get my head around riddles.....so, now, I thought I would see if anyone else could get this one.........

What is a 2D form of 3D norm?

by **justin_luver** » Tue Oct 14, 2003 7:49 pm

what is a 2d form, of 3d norm, cant u give us a clue, its buggin me lol

by **Mr.L** » Tue Oct 14, 2003 8:05 pm

isit a 2d form? because they are different dimensions u cant have a 2D form of a 3D form so because it is a 2D form of a 3D form it msut be in 2D so it is a 2D form. am i right?

by **sovs** » Tue Oct 14, 2003 9:05 pm

Whats a norm?

by **Deadman001** » Tue Oct 14, 2003 9:38 pm

Is it a 2Dimensional drawing of a 3D object???

by **smile** » Wed Oct 15, 2003 7:56 am

I think Deadman might have it. Got me thinking though. #-o

by **Enigma** » Wed Oct 15, 2003 8:23 am

Hmm, I don't think so, because what does that explanation have to do with the term "norm"?

I have no idea though.

by **smile** » Wed Oct 15, 2003 8:25 am

I don't even know what 'norm' means lol Maybe Gem meant to put form but typed norm instead?... I dunno

by **Deadman001** » Wed Oct 15, 2003 4:24 pm

What is a 2D form of 3D norm?

well the way i look at it 2D form is something in the form of a 2 Dimensional object (e.g. drawing, picture)

the 3D norm part i took to mean norm as normal i.e. something that is normally in 3D form

by **fudge** » Thu Oct 16, 2003 12:45 pm

a cube its just a guess but if the mathmatical norm is a right angle then in 3d wouldnt it be a cube

by **fudge** » Thu Oct 16, 2003 12:47 pm

and the 2d form of that would be a square

by **Mr.L** » Thu Oct 16, 2003 6:51 pm

Norm in mathmatical terms is jus normal in our terms. I wouldnt say deadman is right becaus ehis answer a contridiction in itself, There can be 2D drawings of 3D ob jects such as cube pictures but it would be considered 3D because a cube is 3D. If you draw a cube you are adding more dimensions thus making it 3D. Maths is gay. I think it is a 2D form because if you reverse what deadman says then well, theres no such thing as a 2D object in a 3D picture (if u get me) so i rekon its a 2D form.

by **Deadman001** » Thu Oct 16, 2003 7:02 pm

ok just to clarify i would say the picture is 2 dimensional even though it is of a 3D object as it is not an actuall object, it is only a representation of a 3D object.

gotta disagree about maths being gay, mainly cause it was my best subject in school, i only wish i'd taken it further rather than what i did but hey no sense thinkin about what could have been.

come on hurry up and give us the actuall answer, i don't care if i'm right or wrong it's just been buggin me for 2 days now!

Put me out my misery please!

by **Gem** » Thu Oct 16, 2003 10:28 pm

Ok, you guys have been thinking about this one for too long......think of it this way.....a 2D form of something which is NORMALLY 3D..........

a photograph!!!!! he he he

Ok, here's another one.......

Titanic failure, rather chronic,
Vital for the gin and tonic.

Thats gonna take some thinking!!!

by **Deadman001** » Fri Oct 17, 2003 12:30 am

well i was close at least. now the new one, is it ice???

Problem Pages.co.uk Forums

Who can work this one out??

Who can work this one out??

Who is online